A publication of the Centre for Advancing Journalism, University of Melbourne

Health

Framing the right approach to treating addiction

The quality of services provided to people fighting drug addiction is not always of the same standard. It needs to change. Danielle O’Neal reports.

Framing the right approach to treating addiction
Words by Danielle O’Neal
 

For many Melburnians, Richmond’s Victoria Street is simply a place to eat authentic Vietnamese food. But for others, it is proof more needs to be done in the alcohol and other drug treatment sector.

“It’s an example of when parts of society have become so dependent on substances they have given up all hope and are now solely working to feed their habit,” says Dr Christian Smyth from Turning Point, one of Victoria’s leading public providers of addiction rehabilitation services.

“You have open distribution of illicit drugs on the street, you have people dying in alleyways from overdoses.

“And there is no obvious solution. People are not going to stop using drugs because we tell them it’s a bad thing to do.”

Dr Smyth says that treating substance abuse successfully requires an approach that frames addiction in social and medical terms, rather than as a criminal offence.

The opening of Victoria’s first medically supervised injecting room in North Richmond last month is a step in this direction. The centre provides drug users legal amnesty to inject drugs, as well as receive counselling and support to enter treatment pathways, and saved 12 lives in its first week, according to its director Dr Nico Clarke.

However, not all facilities offering addiction treatment services in Victoria are made equal, says Dr Smyth.

The recent proliferation of private, unregulated detox and rehabilitation providers in Victoria has health experts and medical regulatory bodies concerned addicts and their families may face financial exploitation by private rehab operators.

These fears have been echoed in a report from the Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry in Drug Law Reform, which has advocated for the development of national regulatory standards for private rehabilitation operators.

Between February and December last year, 26 complaints were received by the Health Complaints Commissioner in relation to private rehab operators; most of the complaints were in regard to exploitative billing practices.

“A lot of these practices will charge $15,000, $20,000 a month,” says Dr Smyth.

“It’s almost like a consultant in business who suggests you pay them more, the better service you get. None of that is based on anything other than say-so, or mood or human nature.”

Concerns with the non-regulated private sector not only relate to the expense involved in accessing services, but also that such services are not subject to the same ethical, quality and safety provisions as public providers.

As Dr Nicole Lee of 360Edge told the parliamentary inquiry, “The problem is that the whole sector is completely unregulated. So anybody in this room could set up a drug rehab without any qualification or any experience to do so.”

In Victoria, the publicly funded addiction treatment workforce is made up of about 1700 staff across 100 agencies, Kym Peake, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services told the parliamentary inquiry last year.

All treatment providers that receive government funding must be accredited with a recognised health accreditation body and registered with the Department of Health and Human Services. Private rehabilitation operators that do not receive any government funding are not subject to any such regulation.

An ABC Four Corners investigation into the private rehab sector, aired in September 2016, raised concerns about several Victorian private rehab operators. The Hader Clinic, a well-known private rehab in Melbourne that has been operating since 1998, was singled out.

Although the clinic declined requests from Four Corners for an interview in 2016, the current General Manager, Jackson Oppy, told The Citizen that The Hader Clinic offers good value for money treatment.

The Hader Clinic charges $20,500 for a 90-day program.

“We charge $227 a day for residential rehab which includes accommodation, all meals, clinical psychologists, nurse practitioner, a therapeutic program from 7am-11pm at night, with 24 hour supervision support staff,” says Mr Oppy.

“You would struggle to find a hotel in Melbourne for that price.”

Mr Oppy agrees that it is very difficult for families to navigate the public rehab sector and welcomes standardised regulation.

“Unfortunately, people do sometimes end up at disreputable providers providing rehab with unqualified staff in unregistered premises, and they do get their fingers burnt. When that happens the whole private sector gets labelled as sharks.

“We don’t fear regulation, we welcome it, because it will create barriers and stop people renting a house in the suburbs, building a website and calling themselves a rehab.”

Regulation of private alcohol and other drug treatment providers would also assist courts in ruling on substance-related cases.

“Magistrates don’t even know the difference,” says Dr Smyth.

“The organisation who stands next to the client or individual in court will make all sorts of claims about what they can offer from a 28-day rehab or two-year rehab plan – whatever it may be – and the magistrate has no idea whether these guys are any good at what they do.”

Magistrate Tony Parsons, who supervises the Victorian Drug Court, says it is in the best interests of the community and the court that alcohol and other drug rehabilitation services are accredited.

“We wouldn’t order a medical assessment from an unqualified practitioner, nor should we entrust the health of people needing support for addiction to non-accredited rehabilitation providers,” says Mr Parsons.

“An independent accreditation framework will give the court confidence that rehab providers are appropriately qualified and able to provide the services promised.”

The Victorian government is due to respond to the findings of the Inquiry Into Drug Law Reform report by September.

About The Citizen

THE CITIZEN is a publication of the Centre for Advancing Journalism. It has several aims. Foremost, it is a teaching tool that showcases the work of the students in the University of Melbourne’s Master of Journalism and Master of International Journalism programs, giving them real-world experience in working for publication and to deadline. Find out more →

  • Editor: Jo Chandler
  • Reporter: Jack Banister
  • Audio & Video editor: Louisa Lim
  • Data editor: Craig Butt
  • Editor-In-Chief: Andrew Dodd
  • Business editor: Lucy Smy
Winner — BEST PUBLICATION 2016 Ossie Awards